A Quiet Silencing: NEA Withdraws Literary Grants Amid Sudden Policy Shift

In a late-night sweep that sent shockwaves through the literary world, the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) began withdrawing and terminating grant offers to dozens of publishers, literary magazines, and arts organizations on Friday, following President Trump’s proposed defunding of the agency in the 2025 federal budget.

At 10 p.m. on April 26, organizations received abrupt email notifications stating that their grants had either been terminated or withdrawn entirely. The notifications cited a redirection of NEA priorities, emphasizing alignment with the administration’s vision of supporting “projects that reflect the nation’s rich artistic heritage and creativity.” The revised focus includes funding for projects tied to Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), Hispanic Serving Institutions, the upcoming 250th anniversary of American independence, disaster relief, artificial intelligence initiatives, and faith-based community service efforts.

The literary world, however, was not among the priorities listed.

The Community of Literary Magazines and Presses (CLMP) confirmed the extent of the impact. “Of the 51 round one grantees in the FY25 cycle for literary publishing, I’ve heard from 40 so far, and all 40 have had their grants either terminated or withdrawn,” said CLMP executive director Mary Gannon.

These sudden cuts affect a broad swath of respected literary institutions, including:

  • Milkweed Editions, which lost a $50,000 grant

  • Transit Books, publisher of Nobel laureate Jon Fosse, which lost $40,000

  • Nightboat Books, awarded $30,000

  • McSweeney’s Literary Arts, which lost $25,000

  • Hub City Press, awarded $25,000

  • Deep Vellum, which lost $20,000

  • Electric Literature, which lost $12,000

  • N+1, which had been granted $12,500

  • Open Letter Books, a leading publisher of literature in translation

Transit Books issued a public statement Friday:

“We remain as committed as ever to promoting voices and perspectives that represent all facets of the human experience… If you’re able to support our work with a donation, now is a critical time.”

The NEA’s decision to pull funding not only jeopardizes the financial stability of these organizations but also underscores a deeper cultural shift: one that sidelines the literary arts and independent publishing in favor of politicized priorities. The agency’s communications framed the decision as a strategic pivot, but to many in the field, it reads as a targeted silencing.

To add to the blow, the four NEA staffers who worked closely with literary organizations announced in a joint message that they will all be leaving the agency on May 30. “Collectively, the four of us have dedicated 57 years of service to the literary arts field,” the message read. “We reflect with pride on the vast and various impacts the NEA has made… awarding fellowships to nearly 600 translators and over 3,800 writers and poets—often long before their work received other national recognition.”

The news comes just weeks after similar terminations of funding were announced at the National Endowment for the Humanities and the Institute of Museum and Library Services.

With the future of federal arts funding in flux, literary organizations now face an uncertain path. And for many, Friday’s mass termination felt like more than just a budget decision—it felt like the closing of a chapter in American cultural support.

This post contains affiliate links. If you use these links to buy something we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Thank you.